Typically, most topic papers present an argument of some sort. The chapter provides many useful tools in presenting the a new academic’s or aspiring author argument in the best light possible. One of the recommendations it provides is focusing on merely three ways to respond. The chapter explains that sticking to three shall not oversimplify one’s response, but enhance it due to being transparent and direct.
The chapter also discusses how to disagree in a paper. One thing that appeared to be quite useful, was pointing out small things one agrees with before stating the main paint one is opposed to. It gives off the impression of an open mind, and an open minded author does come across as seemingly more intelligent. There is also the “Duh” method where one can state parts of their argument as the obvious,
It also delves into how a writer can agree and disagree simultaneously. There are several specific templates that are recommended. The chapter also points out one of the benefits of this method is it makes the writer speculate. Speculation requires more attention and therefore, tends to make a larger impact.
The “And Yet” portion of chapter explains how one can expresses their own view and clearly explain another persons seamlessly.Using “voice markers” is one method of avoiding writing in the first person. A paragraph by Gregory Mantsios is used as an example, although he never uses the word “I”, his voice comes across effortlessly. Not using first person statements can be quite tricky and often takes much practice to not revert back to.
Although writing in the first person is frowned upon the “And Yet” chapter does clarify there is indeed a time and a place for it. One reason it is necessary, the chapter explains, is due to it assisting one point our their key opinion. Mixing first person methods in can add to a paper.
In the sixth part of the chapter, “Skeptics May Object”, a key point that is brought to one’s attention is that it is healthy to self admittance towards anticipated criticism. One of the reasons that is it can disarm those who oppose you. One trick that is mentioned is calling one’s potential critics by their social label.
The chapter also points out how vital it is to be just towards the opposing side. It is important to explore why and give a fair portion of your work to the other points. It also reflects well on the writer to answer the objections and beat the other side to it.
Well, the chapters were quite informative. It is not as though they are terribly difficult to comprehend, I just a poor writer, however I am optimistic that I may not be as terrible at the end of this semester. Reading these chapters made me realize that I need to work on mastering how my writing can flow in a better manner.
Kaylee Holman 